In the practice of medicine, one generally prefers time tested proven path while treating and trying to prevent diseases. An innovation is usually expected to pass the test of time. The three approved COVID-19 εμβόλια, two mRNA vaccines and one genetically engineered adenovirus vector DNA vaccine, are based on concepts and technologies that have never been used on human beings in the past (though few are approved for use in veterinary medicine). Inactivated vaccines stood the test of time for more than half a century and played key role in control and eradication of many infectious diseases. Were the disadvantages of good-old time-tested method of active immunity development through inactivated vaccines comprising of killed or attenuated germs heavy enough to discard altogether to opt for technologies that were never used on humans before? Apparently, the extraordinary situation presented by the pandemic seems to have superfast-tracked testing and use of the emergent, high potential vaccine and therapeutics development technologies which otherwise would have taken several years to see the light of the day.
Οι τρεις ενέκριναν το COVID-19 εμβόλια επί του παρόντος χορηγείται στους ανθρώπους στο Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο στο πλαίσιο ενός μαζικού προγράμματος εμβολιασμού για την καταπολέμηση της πανδημίας σύμφωνα με τις προτεραιότητες που έχουν ορίσει οι αρχές.
- BNT162b2 (κατασκευή Pfizer/BioNTech): α Εμβόλιο mRNA, μεταφέρει μήνυμα για έκφραση αντιγόνου πρωτεΐνης ιού στα ανθρώπινα κύτταρα
- mRNA-1273 (manufactured by Moderna): a mRNA Εμβόλια act in the same way as above
- ChAdOx1 nCoV-2019 (από Οξφόρδη / AstraZeneca): βασικά, α Εμβόλιο DNA, χρησιμοποιεί γενετικά τροποποιημένο αδενοϊό ως φορέα για να μεταφέρει γονίδιο πρωτεΐνης ακίδας του νέου κοροναϊού το οποίο εκφράζεται στα ανθρώπινα κύτταρα που δρα ως αντιγόνο για την ανάπτυξη ενεργού ανοσίας
Και τα τρία παραπάνω Covid-19 εμβόλια are expected to induce active immunity against novel coronavirus. The process of immunity development (both humoral and cellular) begins following exposure to antigens. In the case of mRNA εμβόλια, this happens after viral spike proteins are expressed in the human cells following injection of the vaccine containing viral messenger RNA. In the case of other, immunity development happens after expression of coronavirus DNA incorporated in the adenovirus. One may argue that these εμβόλια δεν είναι πραγματικά εμβόλια με αυστηρή έννοια, επειδή τα ίδια δεν είναι τα αντιγόνα και δεν μπορούν να πυροδοτήσουν την ανοσολογική απόκριση αυτή καθαυτή έως ότου μεταφραστούν σε ιικές πρωτεΐνες στα ανθρώπινα κύτταρα. Το εμβόλιο, εξ ορισμού ενεργοποιεί τη διαδικασία ανάπτυξης της ενεργού ανοσίας, αλλά στην περίπτωση αυτών των τριών εμβολίων πρέπει να περιμένει έως ότου τα ιικά γονίδια μεταφραστούν σε πρωτεΐνες που με τη σειρά τους θα μπορούσαν να λειτουργήσουν ως αντιγόνα. Αυτά τα τρία εγκεκριμένα εμβόλια βασίζονται σε τεχνολογίες που δεν είχαν χρησιμοποιηθεί ποτέ πριν σε ανθρώπους.
In the last five decades or so, εμβόλια have played key role in dealing with prevention of several infectious diseases (except malaria). The time-tested gold standard was to use killed inactivated germs or germ parts as vaccine. It almost always worked. This is how several infectious diseases were controlled and some eradicated too in the past.
If the current pandemic had struck humanity say a decade ago, we would still have used the good old time-tested εμβόλια made using killed germs but science has progressed much in the recent past. Advances in molecular biology of genes and its potential applications in therapeutics and vaccine development coupled with encouraging results on animal models meant saying goodbye to the existing method of inducing active immunity by exposing to weakened antigens. The idea of tricking human body to produce the viral proteins in the cells that could act as antigens for initiation of antibody formation against the self-manufactured viral proteins is sleek and smart and may be the beacon of future days to come. Just that neither mRNA nor genetically modified adenovirus has ever been used on human beings to trick the body to induce active immunity. Of course, there is first time for everything new. Yes, may be in the peacetime after studying impact for little longer period including on vulnerable population.
True, these new techniques are answers to some of safety issues like reversion risks, unintentional spread or production errors etc associated with the olden types of εμβόλια. Plus, new methods are better targeted – specific antibody against specific viral antigen. But someone missed to take note of something that everyone knew that this pandemic is due to coronavirus, a virus that has a recent history of several epidemics in the past two decades, and a virus known to be notorious for rapid mutation because of lack of proofreading nuclease activity, thereby implying viral antigens are not going to remain static structurally for a long period of time. Apparently, this is what the situation looks like now.
Yes indeed, clinical trials were successfully done for viral gene-based εμβόλια which proved safety and efficacy well within the permissible range. The same applies to the traditional whole virion inactivated COVID-19 vaccine as well whose initial efficacy of about 70% in trial in Brazil was brought down to 50.7% after some volunteers developed mild symptoms. But then whole virion inactivated vaccines are known to elicit mild reactions due to its very nature, possibly a trade-off for active immunity against wider range of antigens.
The performance data of the three approved εμβόλια in the UK, especially pertaining to level of protection provided to the vulnerable people would tell the deeper story in future. For now, if the choice of a vaccine comprising of a wide range of antigens derived from killed inactivated virus may have been better for effectiveness over a longer period of time is in oblivion. May be, for vulnerable people viz. for those at higher risk due to advanced age or comorbidities, quick induction of passive immunity through εξουδετερωτικά αντισώματα μπορεί να ήταν καλύτερη επιλογή και ενεργός οδός ανοσίας για κατά τα άλλα υγιείς.
Προφανώς, η έκτακτη κατάσταση που παρουσιάζεται από την πανδημία φαίνεται να έχει εξαιρετικά γρήγορους ελέγχους και χρήση επειγόντων, υψηλών δυνατοτήτων τεχνολογιών ανάπτυξης εμβολίων και θεραπείας, οι οποίες διαφορετικά θα χρειάζονταν αρκετά χρόνια για να δουν το φως της δημοσιότητας.
***
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29198/scieu/210101
***
